- What is price elasticity?
- Price elasticity of demand: formula and examples
- How to calculate price elasticity of demand?
- What factors impact price elasticity?
- How to classify products based on price elasticity of demand?
- Reach goals with tech-driven price elasticity management
Price elasticity of demand is used to mark the relation between the change in demanded quantity of a product and a change in its price. If a demanded quantity remains the same after the price is changed, the product is considered as an inelastic one and vice versa.
According to recent research, British people spend on average £258 more each year buying branded products over unbranded ones. What it means is that there are particular pricing and non-pricing factors that make customers pay more for products even if cheaper alternatives are available. Together, all these factors compile a price elasticity of demand. Eventually, an accurate calculation of price elasticity enables retailers to maximize their revenue while keeping customers loyal.
In this article, we’re going to dive into the depths of price elasticity of demand to show how helpful might it be on your way to strategic business targets. We would first define the price elasticity, learn how to calculate it, and explore essential formulas and graphs. We’re also going to discuss the factors impacting the price elasticity of demand and find how products in your portfolio could be classified based on the type of price elasticity. Finally, we’d show the way advanced software solutions are used by retailers to deal with the elasticity of price. Let’s start!
The dominating trend implies that consumers buy fewer products if the price increases. What it means is that the price elasticity is in most cases negative. The positive price elasticity implies that the higher price results in an increased demand. The latter situation occurs rather rarely, yet some luxury products might still be the case. Anyway, as a matter of convenience, only positive numbers are usually used to rate the elasticity. The formula to calculate the elasticity of price goes as follows:
The demand is considered elastic in case elasticity is greater than ‘1’ and inelastic if it is ranked below ‘1’. In case elasticity is high, the demand depends on the price dramatically and may change within a short time period. The graph below illustrates the dependence.
Here are two examples showing how price elasticity works in practice. Speaking of the cheap packaged frozen vegetables, consumers are likely to buy them more during the short-term period, yet they won’t buy enormous amounts of vegetables even at low prices during the lasting period. In contrast, consumers are likely to buy the same amount of gasoline regardless of what the price is. Subsequently, the demand is more elastic in case of frozen vegetables compared to gasoline.
Imagine you're a pizzaiolo and the price of pizza is $4 while the demand is 60 slices of pizza per day. If the price is $2, the demand increase to 80 slices per day. To calculate the arc price elasticity of demand, we use the following formula:
'Q' in the formula marks the demanded quantity of a product before and after the change in price while ‘P’ marks the old and new price. Let’s now use the numbers from above and put them in the formula. Here’s what we get:
The calculations show that the demand for pizza is inelastic as the PE we’ve got is between ‘0’ and ‘-1’. What it means is that pizzaiolo does not have too much room for either lowering or increasing the price.
There are dozens of pricing and non-pricing factors that can impact the price elasticity of demand. According to a recent study by researchers from the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute for Marketing Science, the promo conditions and brand perception represent the most impactful factors defining the product’s price elasticity.
Taking into account the results of the mentioned above and other issue-related studies, the following implications for price elasticity management could be outlined:
If the cost is the same or higher than the cost offered by a market leader in the category, the elasticity gets higher as well. It is not the price itself that matters, but the relative price availability, i.e. the way it relates to the category leader and the round point (for example, $10).
To keep the demand optimal, retailers have to take into account the brand strength of the rivals. Therefore, if you’re a follower in price, you should calculate the optimal price index in regard to the segment leader.
Price elasticity also depends on the brand’s “commodification” i.e. its’ assignment to the market value. The brand value could be “diluted” cause the quality of commodities, like washing powder, is more or less the same for every brand. In such case, consumers would buy a less expensive or better-promoted product.
Drastic price increase may ruin the price elasticity of demand. That’s why retailers use a rule of single-digit price increase implying that the round point should not exceed a 9,9% change. If the price is increased by 10%, consumers are likely to get discouraged and, eventually, buy less.
Mass-market products have the highest price elasticity of demand. In contrast, the price elasticity is usually lower for the economy and premium segments.
The price elasticity of demand is different for various groups of consumers. For example, it could be higher in regard to the group of returning brand-loyal shoppers.
The list of implications outlined above is not a comprehensive one, yet it may shed light on the complexity and variety of pricing and non-pricing factors impacting the elasticity of demand. The point is that price elasticity could not be estimated accurately in case only the basic factors are considered.
SKU-based pricing is hardly an effective approach when it comes to long-term goals achievement and strategic growth in retail. To minimize the risk of sales cannibalization and increase customer lifetime values, retailers have no other choice than shifting to portfolio-level pricing. Dividing assortment into particular groups of products depending on their elasticity is one of the major aspects underlying effective portfolio management.
As we’ve already discussed above, the higher the value of price elasticity is, the more sensitive become shoppers in regard to price changes. However, considering the price elasticity of separate products could hardly contribute to a sustainable pricing policy. That’s why retailers have to classify products into groups depending on their elasticity.
There are numerous types of classifications used across the industries. In her topic-related article for HBR, Amy Gallo outlines one of the most balanced price elasticity classifications. The author considers five zones of elasticity:
Perfectly elastic products. Even a minor change in price provokes a significant change in the number of products demanded. Products in this category are often referred to as “pure commodities”.
Relatively elastic products. Relatively insignificant changes in price may cause substantial changes in the number of products being demanded.
Unit elastic products. Any change in price leads to an equal change in the demanded quantity. In such case, the price elasticity equals the point of ‘1’.
Relatively inelastic products. Even a significant change in price is not likely to change radically the demanded quantity of a product. The already mentioned gasoline may serve as a good illustration of a relatively inelastic product.
Perfectly inelastic products. The change in the price is not likely to have any impact on demand. In real life, perfectly inelastic products remain rather a rare case, yet some perfect monopolies might be an example.
The classification presented above represents a unified framework that should not necessarily fit every retailer’s portfolio. In each specific case, a comprehensive classification of products may vary depending on the industry, market type, geographical region or retailer’s size.
Basic formulas to calculate price elasticity of demand are neither too complicated nor sophisticated. However, on a scale of portfolio with hundreds or thousands of SKUs, the human-centric manual calculations of price elasticity might become a problem. If all these calculations fall on the shoulders of pricing managers, the latter could hardly find enough time to focus on strategic business tasks.
The advanced tech solutions, like Competera’s price optimization, are capable to process thousands of data points finding even the most implicit, yet impactful connections between the demand on various products within the portfolio. Besides elasticity, demand-based pricing solutions powered by ML consider dozens of other pricing and non-pricing factors to craft the optimal value offering. Just think: managers consider only 3 pricing and non-pricing factors at once while pricing software can process up to 60 factors.
Each vendor uses own approach to evaluate the price elasticity of demand. At Competera, we use the latest-generation neural network capable of processing billions of data points to ensure the integrity of results with the price effect prediction accuracy of 90-98%. The solution’s workflow is divided into two stages. First, the platform calculates the precise effect of price changes on demand and sales. Then, the state-of-the-art math price optimization uses the results of the first stage to craft optimal prices for the whole portfolio.
You would probably like to check some real-life cases showing how Competrera works in practice. Here’s one example: we’ve recently helped a leading Eastern European apparel retailer Intertop to get to the point of 10.3% gross profit saving along with 200 BPS of profit margin saving after only 6 weeks of using Competera platform. You are welcome to explore more facts and numbers in the case studies page on our website.